[Sh:430.1-3] Elementary Submodel Conventions

January 27, 2011 at 18:39 | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We’re going to be working with elementary submodels a lot, so I wanted to pin down the assumptions we make and the notation we use.

In the current project, we are investing combinatorics relevant to a singular cardinal {\mu}, and {\chi} is a regular cardinal “much much larger” than {\mu}. The exact identity of {\chi} isn’t important. We also need to fix some well-ordering {<_\chi} of {H(\chi)}; we will build this into the structures we consider so that they all have definable Skolem functions.

In general, {\mathfrak{A}} denotes some expansion of {\langle H(\chi),\in, <_\chi\rangle} by at most countably many functions, constants, and relations. I won’t get too pedantic with this, but for example, in the current situation we want {\mathfrak{A}} to contain a name for {\mu}, so that we know {\mu} makes it into any elementary submodel of {\mathfrak{A}}. We won’t make this explicit in our notation.

I will use {{\rm Sk}_{\mathfrak{A}}(B)} (or just {{\rm Sk}(B)}) to denote the Skolem hull of {B} in the structure {\mathfrak{A}}.

I may update this post to reflect new things that I forgot to include…

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: